JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davy, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kates, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davy, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kates, R. E.

Qualitative and quantitative comparison of the cardiac effects of encainide and its three major metabolites in the dog

JM Davy, P Dorian, JP Kantelip, DC Harrison and RE Kates

We have evaluated the electrophysiologic effect of encainide and its three major metabolites, O-demethyl encainide, 3-methoxy-O-demethyl encainide and N-demethyl encainide in an anesthetized dog model. Our results support previous reports that O-demethyl encainide and 3- methoxy-O-demethyl encainide are both more potent than encainide in the depression of conduction. We also have shown that N-demethyl encainide is of about equal potency to encainide. Whereas the major differences between these compounds is primarily one of potency, there are some qualitative differences. Although O-demethyl encainide did not change the ventricular or atrial effective refractory periods significantly, 3- methoxy-O-demethyl encainide and N-demethyl encainide prolonged both. Encainide increased the atrial effective refractory period but did not produce significant changes in the ventricular refractory period. These data support previous suggestions of an important role for these metabolites as modulators of the clinical efficacy of encainide.

Volume 237, Issue 3, pp. 907-911, 06/01/1986
Copyright © 1986 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.