JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trimarco, B.
Right arrow Articles by Condorelli, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trimarco, B.
Right arrow Articles by Condorelli, M.

Effects of prostaglandin synthesis inhibition on sympathetic-and parasympathetic-mediated coronary hemodynamic responses

B Trimarco, A Cuocolo, B Ricciardelli, P Patrignani, M Volpe, N de Luca and M Condorelli

In chloralose-anesthetized dogs with the left circumflex coronary artery perfused at constant flow, the effects of indomethacin or naproxen on coronary and systemic responses to sympathetic and parasympathetic stimulation were evaluated. Sympathetic stimulation was evoked either by 1-min carotid artery occlusion or by epinephrine (5 micrograms) or norepinephrine (5 micrograms) intracoronary administration. Reflex or direct parasympathetic stimulation was produced by ouabain (40 micrograms) or acetylcholine (2.5 micrograms) injection, respectively, in the perfused coronary artery. The administration of indomethacin or naproxen reduced the integrated areas of coronary vasodilatation induced by epinephrine and norepinephrine. The extent of this reduction was dose-dependent with both indomethacin (epinephrine: r = 0.774, n = 35, P less than .001; norepinephrine: r = 0.766, n = 35, P less than .001; norepinephrine: r = 0.799, n = 35, P less than .001) up to 1.5 and 7 mg/kg, respectively. Further increase in dosage of both prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors failed to induce further reduction of integrated areas of coronary vasodilatation. In contrast, the maximum fall in coronary perfusion pressure, induced by both catecholamines, remained unmodified after inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis, whereas a faster return of the perfusion pressure to base line was observed. The extent of cyclooxygenase activity inhibition induced by indomethacin or naproxen, assessed through the radioimmunoassay of thromboxane B2, showed a consistent dose-dependent increase until complete inhibition was attained with 1.5 mg/kg of indomethacin and 7 mg/kg of naproxen. No significant change in the coronary and systemic hemodynamic response induced by carotid occlusion and by ouabain or acetylcholine intracoronary administration was observed. Furthermore, complete cyclooxygenase inhibition, induced by either indomethacin or naproxen, was able to reduce the coronary vasodilatation induced by isoproterenol (5 micrograms) intracoronary injection but failed to modify the coronary vasoconstriction elicited by both epinephrine and norepinephrine in propranolol-treated dogs. These data indicate that the prostaglandin system is involved in the coronary vasodilatation induced by humoral sympathetic stimulation, whereas coronary hemodynamic responses to both neural sympathetic or parasympathetic stimulation are not influenced by the administration of prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors.

Volume 237, Issue 2, pp. 589-599, 05/01/1986
Copyright © 1986 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.