JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coffin, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Spealman, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coffin, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Spealman, R. D.

Modulation of the behavioral effects of chlordiazepoxide by methylxanthines and analogs of adenosine in squirrel monkeys

VL Coffin and RD Spealman

The effects of chlordiazepoxide (CDAP) on suppressed behavior of squirrel monkeys were determined alone and in combination with selected methylxanthines (caffeine, theophylline, 8-phenyltheophylline, theobromine, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine) and analogs of adenosine (L- PIA, N6-cyclohexyladenosine, NECA). Monkeys responded under a fixed- interval schedule of food presentation in which responding was suppressed by a concurrent fixed-ratio schedule of response-produced electric shock. Dose-effect curves were determined by administering cumulative doses i.v. during timeout periods that preceded sequential components of the schedule. When administered alone, CDAP produced dose- related increases in the rate of suppressed responding at doses up to 17.8 mg/kg and decreased responding at a higher dose of 32.0 mg/kg. Under the same conditions, the methylxanthines usually had only small effects on responding over the range of doses studied, whereas L-PIA and NECA usually decreased responding in a dose-related manner. After presession treatment with intermediate doses of caffeine, 8- phenyltheophylline or 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, the increases is suppressed responding produced by CDAP often were larger than those produced by CDAP alone. In contrast, after presession treatment with low doses of L-PIA, NECA or N6-cyclohexyladenosine the increases in suppressed responding normally produced by CDAP were either reduced or eliminated. Although L-PIA, NECA and N6-cyclohexyladenosine attenuated the rate-increasing effects of CDAP, there was no indication that they produced an overall rightward shift in the CDAP dose-effect curve, suggesting that the adenosine analogs did not act simply as competitive antagonists of CDAP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 235, Issue 3, pp. 724-728, 12/01/1985
Copyright © 1985 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. E. Lau, Y. Wang, and J. L. Falk

J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 1997; 281(3): 1013 - 1029.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.