JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Witkin, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Witkin, J. M.

Behavioral studies with anxiolytic drugs. I. Interactions of the benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 with chlordiazepoxide, pentobarbital and ethanol

JE Barrett, LS Brady and JM Witkin

Lever pressing by squirrel monkeys was maintained under two behavioral procedures known to be sensitive to anxiolytic drugs. Under one procedure, responding maintained by food was suppressed by electric shock (punishment). Under a second procedure, responding was maintained under a multiple schedule in which the first response after 5 min produced either food or shock depending on the stimulus that was present throughout the interval (fixed-interval schedule). Under the punishment schedule, chlordiazepoxide (1.0-100 mg/kg), pentobarbital (1.0-17.0 mg/kg) and ethanol (0.5-2.5 g/kg) increased responding. The benzodiazepine antagonist, Ro 15-1788 (1.0-10.0 mg/kg), which was without behavioral activity when given alone, reversed the effects of chlordiazepoxide in a dose-dependent manner. Ro 15-1788 did not antagonize the effects of pentobarbital or ethanol but potentiated the rate-increasing effects of these compounds. Under the multiple fixed- interval food- or shock-presentation schedule, both chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital increased responding maintained by food but only decreased responding maintained by shock. Ro 15-1788 antagonized the rate-increasing effects of chlordiazepoxide under the food schedule and reversed the rate-decreasing effects during the shock-presentation schedule; pentobarbital effects were not altered by Ro 15-1788. Certain dose-combinations of chlordiazepoxide and Ro 15-1788 produced large increases in responding maintained by shock, an effect not seen with either drug alone. These studies indicate that Ro 15-1788 antagonizes the behavioral effects of benzodiazepines selectively but not those of other sedative-hypnotic drugs. These results also suggest that Ro 15- 1788 may exert certain actions of its own or may unmask other drug effects when given in combination with benzodiazepine and nonbenzodiazepine compounds.

Volume 233, Issue 3, pp. 554-559, 06/01/1985
Copyright © 1985 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. L. June, D. Zuccarelli, L. Torres, K. S. Craig, J. Delong, A. Allen, M. R. Braun, C. R. Cason, and J. M. Murphy
High-Affinity Benzodiazepine Antagonists Reduce Responding Maintained by Ethanol Presentation in Ethanol-Preferring Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 1998; 284(3): 1006 - 1914.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.