JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, H.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, L. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, H.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, L. I.

Comparison of the cardiovascular actions of dopamine and epinine in the dog

H Itoh, JD Kohli, SI Rajfer and LI Goldberg

The effects of i.v. infusions of 3 and 6 micrograms/kg/min of dopamine (DA) and epinine on heart rate, arterial blood pressure, regional blood flows and vascular resistances in the renal, mesenteric and femoral vascular beds were compared in pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. At the 3 micrograms/kg/min infusion rate, neither DA nor epinine changed blood pressure, whereas at the higher infusion rate both increased blood pressure by about 20 mm Hg. DA increased renal blood flow significantly at both infusion rates; whereas, epinine did not change renal blood flow. After administration of phenoxybenzamine, both epinine and DA decreased blood pressure; upon adding propranolol, the vasodepressor effect of epinine, but not of DA, was abolished. However, propranolol did not inhibit epinine-mediated vasodilation in the renal or mesenteric vascular beds, but a marked increase in femoral vascular resistance was observed. The addition of (R)-sulpiride, a DA antagonist, abolished DA and epinine-induced vasodilation in the mesenteric and renal vascular beds. Experiments in animals treated with hexamethonium to block ganglion transmission and propranolol to block beta adrenoceptors revealed that both selective alpha-1 (terazosin) and alpha-2 (rauwolscine) adrenoceptor antagonists inhibited the vasopressor response to DA to a greater degree than the responses to epinine. Thus, although DA and epinine possess significant DA1 activity, the consistent increase in renal blood flow observed with DA is not seen with epinine because of the more potent alpha adrenoceptor activity of the latter, which is mediated by both alpha-1 and alpha-2 adrenoceptors.

Volume 233, Issue 1, pp. 87-93, 04/01/1985
Copyright © 1985 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.