JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moursi, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by D'Alecy, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moursi, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by D'Alecy, L. G.

Regional blood flow changes in response to mildly pressor doses of triglycyl desamino lysine and arginine vasopressin in the conscious dog

MM Moursi, DG van Wylen and LG D'Alecy

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is used to treat esophageal variceal hemorrhage but has the drawbacks of rebleeding and reported coronary insufficiencies. In conscious dogs (n = 23) we compared AVP and an analog, triglycyl desamino lysine vasopressin (TDLVP), for arterial pressor responses and changes in regional blood flow. Dogs were infused with saline (n = 5), AVP (n = 7) or TDLVP (n = 7), and blood flow was measured with microspheres during control, infusion and postinfusion in 46 tissue sections including pieces of the esophagus, stomach, liver, kidney, spleen, heart, skin, muscle and brain. TDLVP (1.0 micrograms/kg/min) and AVP (0.025 micrograms/kg/min) produced a similar mean arterial pressure increase of 23 mm Hg and a heart rate decrease of 38 beats/min. TDLVP sustained the increase in mean arterial pressure and reduction in heart rate at 30 min postinfusion whereas AVP did not. Neither AVP nor TDLVP showed a reduction in brain, kidney or liver flow; however, both produced reductions (73 and 61%, respectively, P less than .01) in mucosal-esophageal flow. Only TDLVP reduced mucosal- fundus blood flow (P less than .01). Endocardial flow was reduced (27%) in both TDLVP and AVP groups; however, heart rate also decreased during this time and a linear correlation between these two measurements yielded a value for r2 of 0.83. Thus, TDLVP offers a therapeutic alternative to AVP in treating gastroesophageal varices due to its longer duration of action as represented by the sustained reduction in esophageal and mucosal-fundus flow.

Volume 232, Issue 2, pp. 360-368, 02/01/1985
Copyright © 1985 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.