JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. L.

L-646,462, a cyproheptadine-related antagonist of dopamine and serotonin with selectivity for peripheral systems

M Williams, GE Martin, DC Remy, M Hichens, AW Mangel, DA Taylor, GG Yarbrough, RJ Bendesky, SW King and JL Robinson

The selectivity, peripheral vs. central actions, of the antidopaminergic agent L-646,462 was assessed in two ways. First, elevation of prolactin in serum (peripheral) and homovanillic acid in the striatum were measured in rats. L-646,462 was found to have a central/peripheral activity ratio of 143, whereas comparable values derived for haloperidol, metoclopramide and domperidone were 1.4, 9.4 and 1305, respectively. Second, the ID50 values required to block apomorphine-induced emesis in beagles (peripheral receptor-mediated response) were compared with those required to block apomorphine- induced stereotypy (central receptor-mediated response) in rats. Central/peripheral ID50 ratios of 234, 9.2, 129 and 7040 were obtained, respectively, for L-646,462, haloperidol, metoclopramide and domperidone. The selectivity of L-646,462 for peripheral serotonin (5- HT) receptors in rats was determined by measuring its effectiveness in blocking 5-HT-induced paw edema (peripheral response) and 5- hydroxytryptophan-induced head twitch (central response); a ratio of 114 was obtained. This value agrees nicely with the ratio of 143 derived in the rat ( vide supra) for peripheral selectivity for dopamine receptors. L-646,462 is, therefore, selective in vivo, preferentially blocking dopamine and 5-HT receptors located outside the blood-brain barrier. With regard to dopamine-receptors, L-646,462 was about equipotent and more selective than metoclopramide, while being less potent and less selective than domperidone. Unlike metoclopramide or domperidone, L-646,462 also possessed a reasonably potent 5-HT receptor antagonist effect in vivo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 229, Issue 3, pp. 775-781, 06/01/1984
Copyright © 1984 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
H. J. Durivage and N. L. Burnham
Prevention and Management of Toxicities Associated With Antineoplastic Drugs
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, January 1, 1991; 4(1): 27 - 48.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.