JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nowowieski, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nowowieski, P.

Comparison of diazepam and oxazepam: preference, liking and extent of abuse

RR Griffiths, DR McLeod, GE Bigelow, IA Liebson, JD Roache and P Nowowieski

In a residential hospital research ward setting, the effects of and preference for placebo, oxazepam (480 mg) and diazepam (40, 80 and 160 mg) were studied in human volunteers with histories of sedative drug abuse. Doses p.o. were administered every 3rd day under double-blind conditions. After an initial exposure to the letter-coded test drugs, a series of choice days was scheduled on which subjects chose between two available drug alternatives. Compared with oxazepam, diazepam produced greater liking (area under the time-action curve), peak liking and euphoria and was judged to be of greater monetary street value. Diazepam was categorized as producing barbiturate-like subjective effects more frequently than was oxazepam (54 vs. 21%), whereas oxazepam was identified as placebo more often than diazepam (32 vs. 4%). Diazepam was associated with a more rapid onset of effect than was oxazepam, and this rapid onset was repeatedly cited by subjects in poststudy written comments as being a desirable feature of the drug effect. In choice tests, 80 and 160 mg of diazepam were preferred to 480 mg of oxazepam on 62.5 and 91.7% of the choice tests, respectively. In choice tests between placebo and drug, placebo was never preferred to diazepam; however, placebo was preferred to oxazepam on 21.4% of choice tests. Overall, these results extend previous experimental observations suggesting that diazepam has a higher abuse liability than oxazepam. The results are also compatible with an analysis of epidemiological data showing that diazepam abuse uniformly exceeds oxazepam abuse on seven epidemiological measures of drug abuse.

Volume 229, Issue 2, pp. 501-508, 05/01/1984
Copyright © 1984 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
R. S Bobrow
Benzodiazepines revisited
Fam. Pract., June 1, 2003; 20(3): 347 - 349.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. A. Marsch, W. K. Bickel, G. J. Badger, J. P. Rathmell, M. D. B. Swedberg, B. Jonzon, and C. Norsten-Hoog
Effects of Infusion Rate of Intravenously Administered Morphine on Physiological, Psychomotor, and Self-Reported Measures in Humans
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2001; 299(3): 1056 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.