JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magos, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magos, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, A. R.

Differences in the effects of selenite and biological selenium on the chemical form and distribution of mercury after the simultaneous administration of HgCl2 and selenium to rats

L Magos, TW Clarkson and AR Hudson

The interaction was compared between inorganic (HgCl2) mercury and selenite (Na2SeO3) vs. the interaction between inorganic mercury and biological selenium (a freeze-dried preparation of liver from rats treated with selenite). Organ concentrations of selenium were always significantly lower after biological selenium than after selenite. Biological selenium affected the organ distribution of inorganic mercury differently than selenite. Furthermore, the speciation of mercury was affected by this form of selenium. A mercury-selenide compound (presumably HgSe) accounted for a greater proportion of total mercury in tissues after selenite than after a dose of biological selenium. Administration of selenomethionine had a similar effect on the speciation of mercury to that seen after biological selenium. As the forms of selenium in selenomethionine or selenium deposited in the liver are most likely nearer than selenite to selenium present in food, our results suggest that, as far as the reaction of mercury with selenide is concerned, experiments with selenite overestimate the protective effect of dietary selenium against inorganic mercury and possibly against methylmercury.

Volume 228, Issue 2, pp. 478-483, 02/01/1984
Copyright © 1984 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.