JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Checler, F.
Right arrow Articles by Kitabgi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Checler, F.
Right arrow Articles by Kitabgi, P.

Neurotensin analogs [D-TYR11] and [D-PHE11]neurotensin resist degradation by brain peptidases in vitro and in vivo

F Checler, JP Vincent and P Kitabgi

The present study was designed to compare the susceptibility of neurotensin (NT), [3H]NT, [D-Tyr11]NT and [D-Phe11]NT to degradation by 1) rat brain synaptic membranes in vitro and 2) after i.c.v. administration in the rat in vivo. Degradation was assessed by purifying the peptides using reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography and by measuring the amount of radioactive or absorbing (OD 230) material under each peptide peak. In contrast to NT, [D- Tyr11]NT and [D-Phe11]NT were resistant to degradation by brain synaptic peptidases in vitro. Furthermore, NT was rapidly metabolized in brain tissues after i.c.v. administration, whereas [D-Tyr11]NT was metabolically stable. The present data confirm the central role of NT residue Tyr11 in the mechanisms of NT inactivation by brain synaptic peptidases. They account for the higher in vivo potency of [D-Tyr11]NT as compared with its in vitro potency. Finally, they explain, at least in part, the need to administer large doses of NT in the brain in order to observe neurobehavioral and neuropharmacological effects.

Volume 227, Issue 3, pp. 743-748, 12/01/1983
Copyright © 1983 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.