JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Herling, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Herling, S.

Discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam in rats: evidence for a maximal effect

HE Shannon and S Herling

Rats were trained to discriminate between saline and either 0.3, 1.0, 3.0 or 6.0 mg/kg of diazepam in a two-choice, discrete-trial avoidance procedure. Diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, flurazepam and pentobarbital occasioned dose-related increases in diazepam-appropriate responding in all four training dose groups. Increasing the training dose of diazepam from 0.3 to 1.0 mg/kg resulted in approximately a 3-fold shift to the right in the dose-effect curves for each of these four drugs. However, increasing the training dose to 3.0 or 6.0 mg/kg did not result in additional, concomitant shifts in these dose-effect curves. Moreover, the dose-effect curves of nine additional benzodiazepine analogs also did not differ markedly in rats trained with either 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg of diazepam. The nonbenzodiazepines ethanol, phencyclidine, cyproheptadine and ketocyclazocine failed to produce diazepam-like discriminative stimuli in rats trained with either 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg of diazepam. In rats trained with 1.0 mg/kg of diazepam, Ro 11-6896, but not its inactive stereoisomer Ro 11-6893, occasioned diazepam-appropriate responding. Furthermore, the selective benzodiazepine antagonist CGS8216 blocked the effects of diazepam but not the diazepam-like effects of pentobarbital. These results demonstrate that the discriminative effects of diazepam are qualitatively similar across this 20-fold range of training doses; quantitatively, the discriminative effects of diazepam appear to reach a maximum and plateau above a training dose of 1.0 mg/kg in rats.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 227, Issue 1, pp. 160-166, 10/01/1983
Copyright © 1983 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
N. A. Ator and R. R. Griffiths
Drug Discrimination Analysis of Partial Agonists at the Benzodiazepine Site. I. Differential Effects of U-78875 Across Training Conditions in Baboons and Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 1999; 289(3): 1434 - 1446.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
N. A. Ator and R. R. Griffiths
Selectivity in the Generalization Profile in Baboons Trained to Discriminate Lorazepam: Benzodiazepines, Barbiturates and Other Sedative/Anxiolytics
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 1997; 282(3): 1442 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
R.J. Rauch and I.P. Stolerman
Midazolam cue in rats: effects of drugs acting on GABA and 5-hydroxytryptamine systems, anticonvulsants and sedatives
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 1987; 1(2): 71 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.