JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNicholas, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Cherian, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNicholas, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Cherian, S.

Physical dependence on diazepam and lorazepam in the dog

LF McNicholas, WR Martin and S Cherian

Dogs, surgically implanted with a gastric fistula, were chronically dosed with diazepam or lorazepam. Diazepam (60 mg/kg/day) or lorazepam (100 mg/kg/day) was administered intragastrically in four divided daily doses. Beginning no less than 2 weeks after the attainment of stabilization doses, dogs underwent withdrawal experiments, repeated at 2-week intervals. At a time of withdrawal determined by a Latin square crossover design, dogs were observed for 8 hr for signs of abstinence. Both diazepam and lorazepam caused a withdrawal abstinence syndrome to appear upon abrupt discontinuation of the drug. The two abstinence syndromes had many signs in common, including tremor, hot foot walking, rigidity and decreased food intake, but the lorazepam withdrawal abstinence syndrome was much less intense and had a shorter latency to onset than the diazepam abstinence syndrome, which also included clonic and tonic-clonic convulsions and was lethal in two dogs. Furthermore, the diazepam withdrawal abstinence syndrome was biphasic, the first phase apparent by 24 hr and a second phase beginning at 48 hr, whereas the lorazepam syndrome was not. Diazepam suppressed the major signs of diazepam abstinence in a dose-related manner, but failed to completely suppress all signs of abstinence. CGS-8216, a pyrazoloquinoline benzodiazepine antagonist, precipitated abstinence in the diazepam- dependent dog, but did not precipitate tonic-clonic seizures. No abstinence syndrome was precipitated in the lorazepam-dependent dog. These results would suggest that whereas diazepam and lorazepam both cause physical dependence the two syndromes are not the same and, furthermore, that physical dependence on, and withdrawal from, diazepam involves at least two separate mechanisms with different selectivity for benzodiazepine agonists and antagonists.

Volume 226, Issue 3, pp. 783-789, 09/01/1983
Copyright © 1983 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.