JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marks, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marks, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, A. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*NICOTINE
*NICOTINE TARTRATE

Genetics of nicotine response in four inbred strains of mice

MJ Marks, JB Burch and AC Collins

The effects of nicotine on five behavioral and physiological measures were determined in four inbred mouse strains (BALB, C57BL, DBA and C3H). In addition, the binding characteristics of nicotine and alpha- bungarotoxin, two ligands which appear to label different nicotinic receptors, were measured in seven discrete brain regions, as well as in whole brain. A number of differences in response to nicotine were found among the four inbred strains. Whereas nicotine depressed open-field activity of BALB, C57BL and DBA mice in a dose-dependent manner, low doses of nicotine increased locomotor activity in C3H mice. The doses of nicotine tested reduced Rotarod performance in DBA and C57BL mice but not in C3H and BALB mice. All four strains displayed a dose- dependent decrease in body temperature after nicotine administration. The BALB mice were more sensitive to the drug than were the C3H, whereas the effects on C57BL and DBA mice were intermediate. All four strains showed a transient increase in respiration only after a high (2.0 mg/kg) nicotine dose. No dose of nicotine was found to have an effect on the startle response after auditory stimulation in three of the strains; only the C3H mice exhibited enhanced startle after nicotine was administered. Differences in DL-[ 3H ]nicotine binding among the seven brain regions were noted in each strain, but no differences among strains were observed. The IC50 values for inhibition of this binding by nicotine did not differ among brain regions within any strain or within any region among strains. Similarly, nicotine inhibited alpha-[125I]bungarotoxin binding with equal potency in all brain regions of each of the four strains; however, the binding of this ligand was significantly lower in the midbrain and hippocampus of DBA mice than it was in these regions in the other three strains. Thus, genetic factors influence response to nicotine, but variation in response is not easily explained by differences in brain nicotinic receptors.

Volume 226, Issue 1, pp. 291-302, 07/01/1983
Copyright © 1983 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
A. R. Glatt, K. Denton, and J. D. Boughter Jr
Variation in Nicotine Consumption in Inbred Mice Is Not Linked to Orosensory Ability
Chem Senses, September 4, 2008; (2008) bjn049v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. F. Cardoso, B. R. Souza, T. P. Amadeu, S. S. Valenca, L. C. M. S. Porto, and A. M. A. Costa
Effects of Cigarette Smoke in Mice Wound Healing is Strain Dependent
Toxicol Pathol, December 1, 2007; 35(7): 890 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
A. R. Tapper, S. L. McKinney, M. J. Marks, and H. A. Lester
Nicotine responses in hypersensitive and knockout {alpha}4 mice account for tolerance to both hypothermia and locomotor suppression in wild-type mice
Physiol Genomics, November 14, 2007; 31(3): 422 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Mamede, K. Ishizu, M. Ueda, T. Mukai, Y. Iida, H. Kawashima, H. Fukuyama, K. Togashi, and H. Saji
Temporal Change in Human Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor After Smoking Cessation: 5IA SPECT Study
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1829 - 1835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. I. Damaj, E. C. K. Siu, E. M. Sellers, R. F. Tyndale, and B. R. Martin
Inhibition of Nicotine Metabolism by Methoxysalen: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacological Studies in Mice
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 250 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. E. McCallum, N. Parameswaran, T. Bordia, H. Fan, J. M. McIntosh, and M. Quik
Differential Regulation of Mesolimbic {alpha}3/{alpha}6beta2 and {alpha}4beta2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Sites and Function after Long-Term Oral Nicotine to Monkeys
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2006; 318(1): 381 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. W. Bergen and N. Caporaso
Cigarette Smoking
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 18, 1999; 91(16): 1365 - 1375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. R. Breese, M. J. Marks, J. Logel, C. E. Adams, B. Sullivan, A. C. Collins, and S. Leonard
Effect of Smoking History on [3H]Nicotine Binding in Human Postmortem Brain
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 1997; 282(1): 7 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
S. Wonnacott
Brain Nicotine Binding Sites
Human and Experimental Toxicology, September 1, 1987; 6(5): 343 - 353.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.