JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willcockson, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Willis, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Willcockson, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Willis, W. D.

Effects of biogenic amines on raphe-spinal tract cells

WS Willcockson, KD Gerhart, CL Cargill and WD Willis

Stimulation in the nucleus raphe magnus produces analgesia in behavioral paradigms and inhibits spinal cord nociceptive neurons. Similar effects result from stimulation of the periaqueductal gray (PAG). Such actions may be mediated via a synaptic link between PAG and nucleus raphe magnus or the adjacent reticular formation. In this study we have examined the effects of biogenic amines applied iontophoretically in the vicinity of nucleus raphe magnus neurons that project to the spinal cord in monkeys. Raphe-spinal tract (RST) neurons were identified by antidromic activation after stimulation of the dorsolateral funiculi at an upper lumbar level. The actions of serotonin, quipazine, norepinephrine, dopamine and acetylcholine (ACh) were tested against the background activity, the activity evoked by glutamate pulses or the excitation of RST cells by stimulation in the PAG. Serotonin, quipazine, norepinephrine and dopamine produced a current-dependent inhibition of background activity and the responses to glutamate pulses in all RST cells tested. No cases of excitation were found. By contrast, ACh enhanced activity produced by glutamate pulses in all RST cells observed. ACh also enhanced the background activity of all but one of the RST cells; however, ACh did not activate cells with little or no background discharge. Serotonin and norepinephrine often inhibited PAG excitation of RST cells. No facilitation of PAG excitation was observed. We conclude that the actions of serotonergic and catecholaminergic agonists on raphe-spinal cells are inhibitory whereas the effect of ACh is facilitatory.

Volume 225, Issue 3, pp. 637-645, 06/01/1983
Copyright © 1983 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Nalivaiko and W. W. Blessing
Potential Role of Medullary Raphe-Spinal Neurons in Cutaneous Vasoconstriction: An In Vivo Electrophysiological Study
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2002; 87(2): 901 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
W. Bara-Jimenez, M. Aksu, B. Graham, S. Sato, and M. Hallett
Periodic limb movements in sleep: State-dependent excitability of the spinal flexor reflex
Neurology, April 25, 2000; 54(8): 1609 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.