JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mailman, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mailman, R. B.

N-oxides of phenothiazine antipsychotics: effects on in vivo and in vitro estimates of dopaminergic function

MH Lewis, E Widerlov, DL Knight, CD Kilts and RB Mailman

Although it is known that N-oxidation is a major route for the metabolism of tertiary amine drugs in humans, the extent to which N- oxide (NO) metabolites of clinically used phenothiazine antipsychotics contribute to the neuropharmacology of the parent drug has been uncertain. After direct lateral ventricular injection of rats, both fluphenazine-NO and trifluoperazine-NO (piperazinyl-4-NO) had significant antidopaminergic activity as shown by their antagonism of amphetamine-induced locomotion and, to a lesser extent, of apomorphine- induced stereotypy. In vitro, fluphenazine-NO and trifluoperazine-NO inhibited both [3H]spiperone binding to rat striatal membranes and dopamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in striatal homogenates. Conversely, chlorpromazine (CPZ)-NO (side-chain oxide) did not have significant antidopaminergic activity in either in vitro test, nor did it block amphetamine or apomorphine-induced behavior when centrally administered. These latter results were surprising because it had been reported that CPZ-NO had significant antidopaminergic activity when administered by i.p. injection. In our experiments, i.p. administration of CPZ-NO or CPZ resulted in increased concentrations in brain of the acidic metabolites of dopamine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid. However, for CPZ-NO, this was shown to occur concomitantly with the peripheral conversion of the NO back to the parent drug. This suggests that although CPZ-NO does not itself have antidopaminergic properties, it may be readily converted to CPZ or other active species that contribute to pharmacological responses. These data suggest that the NOs of the phenothiazines may contribute to the neuropharmacological actions of antipsychotic drugs via several mechanisms, and underscore the necessity of correlating metabolic and neuropharmacological data.

Volume 225, Issue 3, pp. 539-545, 06/01/1983
Copyright © 1983 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. J. LaHoste, B. L. Henry, and J. F. Marshall
Dopamine D1 Receptors Synergize with D2, But Not D3 or D4, Receptors in the Striatum without the Involvement of Action Potentials
J. Neurosci., September 1, 2000; 20(17): 6666 - 6671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.