JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anwer, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hegner, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anwer, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hegner, D.

Sodium and chloride dependency of dibucaine- and procaine-induced choleresis in isolated perfused rat livers

MS Anwer and D Hegner

The effect of local anesthetics, dibucaine and procaine, on hepatic bile formation was studied in the isolated perfused rat liver. Perfusate Na+ and Cl- were replaced by other ions to define the possible mechanism of action. A single dose (50 mumol) of dibucaine produced an initial cholestasis followed by choleresis. Whereas dibucaine produced only choleresis at a lower dose (10 mumol), only the cholestatic effect was seen at a higher dose (100 mumol). Procaine, on the other hand, produced only choleresis at all doses (1, 10 and 100 mumol); this choleresis was associated with biliary secretion of procaine and its metabolites. Neither dibucaine nor procaine affected the low endogenous bile acid secretion in these studies. The diffusion permeability coefficient of [carboxy-14C]inulin was not altered significantly by dibucaine and procaine, suggesting no significant alteration of biliary permeability. Biliary secretion of Na+ or Cl- declined during cholestasis and increased during choleresis. The initial cholestatic effect of dibucaine was still present when perfusates Na+ and Cl- were replaced by permeable Li+ or NO3-, but declined when Cl- was replaced by relatively impermeable isethionate, suggesting a nonspecific effect. The choleretic effect of both dibucaine and procaine, however, declined significantly when Na+ or Cl- was replaced by Li+, NO3- or isethionate-. These ion-substitutions did not affect significantly the biliary secretion of procaine and its metabolites. The ability to induce biliary secretion of Na+ and Cl- also decreased when Cl- was replaced by NO3- or isethionate and when Na+ was replaced by Li+, respectively. These results suggest that a part of the choleretic effect of both dibucaine and procaine is specifically dependent on Na+ and Cl-. This fraction is thus unlikely to be due to the osmotic effect of the secreted drug. Further studies showed that dibucaine inhibited Na+-dependent hepatic uptake of taurocholate, suggesting possible interference with other Na+-dependent transport processes. It is proposed that although a part of the choleresis is due to the osmotic effect of the secreted drug, the specific dependency of a portion of the choleretic effect on Na+ and Cl- is due to inhibition of Na+-coupled Cl- reabsorption from the canaliculi.

Volume 225, Issue 2, pp. 284-290, 05/01/1983
Copyright © 1983 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.