JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horn, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, L. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horn, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, L. I.

Facilitation of ganglionic transmission by sulpiride: evidence for an inhibitory role of dopamine in the canine sympathetic ganglion

PT Horn, JD Kohli and LI Goldberg

Effects of the (R) and (S) enantiomers of sulpiride, a potent dopamine (DA) antagonist, on ganglionic transmission were studied in anesthetized dogs. The pre- and postganglionic nerves of cardiac sympathetic ganglia were stimulated electrically, and heart rate was monitored as a measure of ganglionic transmission and sympathetic nerve activity. The heart rate was free from influence of the central nervous system. (R)- And (S)-sulpiride injected i.a. close to the blood supply of the ganglia did not alter basal heart rate, but facilitated ganglionic transmission as demonstrated by an increase in the tachycardia induced by preganglionic nerve stimulation. The (R) enantiomer was 4 times more active than the (S) enantiomer in this respect. Neither enantiomer affected the tachycardia induced by postganglionic nerve stimulation. Norepinephrine and DA injected i.a. caused inhibition of the tachycardia induced by preganglionic nerve stimulation. The inhibitory effect of both catecholamines was antagonized by the sulpiride enantiomers (R)-sulpiride was about 4-fold more potent than (S)-sulpiride in antagonizing DA, whereas (S)- sulpiride was more active against norepinephrine. The sulpiride enantiomers affected neither the tachycardia induced by i.a. administration of acetylcholine nor the bradycardia induced by vagal nerve stimulation. Thus, cholinesterase inhibition and ganglionic stimulation were excluded. These data are, therefore, consistent with the hypothesis that the facilitatory action of the sulpiride enantiomers is related to the antagonism of catecholamines. Positive correlation between the activity of the (R) enantiomer to facilitate ganglionic transmission and to antagonize DA suggests that DA is a physiologically released catecholamine modulating transmission in the cardiac sympathetic ganglia of the dog.

Volume 223, Issue 2, pp. 462-468, 11/01/1982
Copyright © 1982 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.