JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Downes, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Downes, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*PAPAVERINE HYDROCHLORIDE
*THEOPHYLLINE

Bronchodilator mechanisms in bullfrog lung: differences in response to isoproterenol, theophylline and papaverine

SM Taylor and H Downes

The effects of bronchodilators and smooth muscle relaxants on mechanical responses and lung cyclic nucleotide levels in the isolated hemilung of Rana catesbeiana demonstrate striking differences in intensity and time course of drug action in an unstimulated preparation of airway smooth muscle. Isoproterenol, nitroprusside and nitroglycerin elicit a fast onset relaxation (minutes) with ceiling effects at 20, 22 and 43%, respectively, of maximal relaxation. Theophylline, dibutyryl cyclic AMP and papaverine produce maximal or near maximal relaxation, but require 8 to 32 hr for peak effect. Papaverine-induced relaxation is accompanied by a slow increase in lung cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP and is markedly accelerated by isoproterenol. Theophylline (10(-3) M) produces no change in cyclic nucleotide levels and its relaxant effect is not accelerated by isoproterenol. The hierarchy of relaxant responses suggests drug action at discrete loci in a highly compartmentalized effector chain, with cyclic AMP-dependent mechanisms separable into at least two components. The first is activated by isoproterenol and elicits a rapid, limited response, presumably reflecting an increase in cyclic AMP in a relatively restricted pool. The second is activated by papaverine and elicits a very slow, but complete relaxation, presumably reflecting a more pervasive or diffuse accumulation of cyclic AMP secondary to phosphodiesterase inhibition. The major portion of theophylline-induced relaxation in this preparation appears to be independent of changes in cyclic nucleotide metabolism.

Volume 223, Issue 2, pp. 359-367, 11/01/1982
Copyright © 1982 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.