JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malo, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malo, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, R. L.

Effects of intravenous and aerosol nifedipine on prostaglandin F2 alpha and histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in anesthetized dogs

PE Malo, MA Wasserman and RL Griffin

The effect of nifedipine, a calcium slow channel blocking drug, was investigated by varying routes of administration in a canine model of pharmacologically induced bronchoconstriction. Control bronchopulmonary responses, i.e., increases in pulmonary resistance (RL) and decreases in dynamic lung compliance were accomplished by aerosols of prostaglandin F2 alpha and histamine in normal pentobarbital- anesthetized beagles. When infused i.v. within the range 200 to 400 micrograms/kg, nifedipine afforded significant protection vs. RL changes due to prostaglandin F2 alpha (84--89% inhibition). Aerosol pretreatment by nifedipine (0.1 and 1.0%) also produced significant inhibition in RL changes caused by prostaglandin F2 alpha. A single i.v. injection (200 micrograms/kg) of nifedipine provided significant protection against RL changes due to a histamine challenge for 240 min. The onset of protection occurred within 15 min and maximum protection occurred during the 60 to 90-min period after the single injection of nifedipine. A single aerosol pretreatment of nifedipine (0.1%) significantly blocked RL changes against successive histamine aerosol challenges at 15-, 30- and 60-min time periods. Infused nifedipine failed to have any relaxant effect on the resting base line of either RL or dynamic lung compliance, whereas aerosolized nifedipine did decrease resting airway tone intrinsically, although not significantly. In addition, cardiovascular side effects by the aerosol route were slight compared to those observed by the i.v. route of nifedipine. Therefore, delivery of a calcium channel antagonist by either the aerosol or i.v. route can inhibit pharmacologically induced bronchoconstriction.

Volume 221, Issue 2, pp. 410-415, 05/01/1982
Copyright © 1982 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.