![]() |
|
|
DW Hein, JG Omichinski, JA Brewer and WW Weber
Liver N-acetyltransferase (NAT) preparations (105,000 x g cytosol) were obtained from both sexes of 26 strains of inbred hamsters. Liver NAT activity levels were determined for six arylamine substrates; isoniazid, p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), p-aminosalicylic acid (PAS), sulfamethazine (SMZ), procainamide and 2-aminofluorene. The N- acetylation of isoniazid, SMZ, procainamide and 2-aminofluorene exhibited a monomorphic expression in the hamster as the genetic variation in NAT activity levels between hamster strains was only about 2-fold for each substrate. In contrast, the N-acetylation of PABA and PAS showed a polymorphic expression in the hamster. Two inbred hamster lines (Bio 1.5 and Bio 82.73) had over 400-fold lower PABA NAT and over 20-fold lower PAS NAT activity levels than did the other inbred strains. In addition, the genetically determined N-acetylation differences between the rapid and slow acetylator hamster strains were also demonstrated in vivo for PABA but not for SMZ. Comparison of Michaelis-Menten kinetic constants of PABA NAT activity in a rapid and slow acetylator strain showed a 20-fold lower Km in the rapid acetylator strain suggesting an intrinsic structural difference in rapid and slow acetylator hamster liver NAT. Thus, the pharmacogenetic expression of the N-acetylation polymorphism is quite unique in the inbred hamster, in that PABA and PAS are genetically polymorphic substrates, whereas isoniazid, SMZ, procainamide and 2-aminofluorene are monomorphic, in direct contrast to man and rabbit.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Estrada, K. C. Kanelakis, G. N. Levy, and W. W. Weber Tissue- and Gender-Specific Expression of N-Acetyltransferase 2 (Nat2*) during Development of the Outbred Mouse Strain CD-1 Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2000; 28(2): 139 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Stevens, M. Payton, E. Sim, and C. A. McQueen N-Acetylation of the Heterocyclic Amine Batracylin by Human Liver Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 1999; 27(9): 966 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||