JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verbeeck, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Branch, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verbeeck, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Branch, R. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*FUROSEMIDE

Disposition of furosemide in functionally hepatectomized dogs

RK Verbeeck, JF Gerkens, GR Wilkinson and RA Branch

To assess the role of the liver in the elimination of furosemide, the disposition kinetics of the diuretic after intravenous administration were studied in dogs with total devascularization of the liver and sham- operated animals. Functional hepatectomy caused no significant changes in either the renal or the nonrenal clearances of furosemide; renal = 124.2 +/- 27.1 (mean +/- SE) and 106.6 +/- 17.5 ml/min and nonrenal = 148.2 +/- 11.4 and 112.6 +/- 21.0 ml/min in sham-operated and hepatectomized dogs, respectively. Devascularization of the liver had no effect on the plasma binding of furosemide which was 90.0% in the sham-operated and 88.2% in the hepatectomized animals. The steady-state volume of distribution of furosemide was relatively small, 0.70 +/- 0.09 liters/kg in control dogs and hepatectomy resulted in a reduction in this volume (0.58 +/- 0.09 liters/kg). This indicates that the liver is a significant organ for distribution of furosemide in the dog. Urinary recoveries of parent drug (43.2% of the dose in sham-operated dogs ad 49.1% in hepatectomized animals) and of its glucuronide (4.3% in sham-operated and 5.5% in hepatectomized dogs) were not influenced by hepatic devascularization. These findings demonstrate that, although nonrenal clearance accounts for about 50% of the elimination of furosemide, the liver does not play a significant role in this process in the dog.

Volume 216, Issue 3, pp. 479-483, 03/01/1981
Copyright © 1981 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
M. G. Lee and W. L. Chiou
Mechanism of Ascorbic Acid Enhancement of the Bioavailability and Diuretic Effect of Furosemide
Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 1998; 26(5): 401 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.