JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, L.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, L.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ATROPINE
*POTASSIUM CHLORIDE

A comparative study of two parasympatholytic bronchodilator agents: ipratropium bromide and diphemanil methylsulfate

L Diamond and M O'Donnell

Ipratropium and diphemanil are synthetic quaternary ammonium compounds with antimuscarinic properties. By using in vitro measurements of tension changes in isolated guinea-pig trachealis muscle strips and in vivo measurements of lung mechanics changes in anesthetized, vagotomized cats, the two drugs were compared in terms of their relative bronchodilator potency, mode of action and apparent site of activity in the bronchial tree. Ipratropium and diphemanil were about equipotent in antagonizing airway smooth muscle contraction induced by the cholinergic agonists, methacholine (in vitro) and carbachol (in vivo). When noncholinergic stimulation was used to augment smooth muscle tone, i.e., hypertonic potassium in the isolated preparations and serotonin in the vagotomized animals, only diphemanil exhibited significant bronchodilator activity. Simultaneous measurements of pulmonary resistance and dynamic compliance were used to partition in vivo bronchodilator effects between large and small airways. The parasympatholytic bronchodilator effects of both drugs were distributed uniformly along the bronchial tree, whereas the direct spasmolytic action of diphemanil appeared to manifest itself preferentially on large airways.

Volume 216, Issue 1, pp. 1-5, 01/01/1981
Copyright © 1981 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.