JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wainer, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rothberg, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wainer, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rothberg, R. M.

The specificity of antimorphine and antimeperidine antibodies and their reactivity with opioid peptides

BH Wainer, WE Wung, M Connors and RM Rothberg

The specificity of antimorphine and antimeperidine antisera was measured by competitive displacement of immunizing radiolabeled haptens. Antimorphine antisera demonstrated a high degree of specificity for a conformation of the phenylpiperidine moiety contained within the structures of morphine and its congeners of the morphinan and benzomorphan series. Antimeperidine antisera demonstrated a high degree of specificity for a different conformation of the phenylpiperidine moiety represented within the structures of meperidine and its semisynthetic derivatives. The reactivity of methionine- and leucine-enkephalin, several synthetic enkephalin analogs, and alpha- and beta-endorphin with the antibodies was tested using purified immunoglobulin G in order to avoid serum-induced proteolysis. No significant cross-reactivity of antimorphine antibodies with any of the opioid peptides was detected. All of the opioid peptides tested exhibited weak but immunologically specific cross-reactivity with antimeperidine antibodies. These findings suggest that conformations analogous to the phenylpiperidine moiety in morphine as have been proposed for [Tyr1] in opioid peptides do not appear to be present as measured by immunochemical methods. A conformation with weak stereochemical similarity to the phenylpeperidine moiety in meperidine does appear to be present. The possible homologies between [Phe4] of opioid peptides, meperidine and hydrophobic side chains of certain oripavine derivatives are discussed.

Volume 208, Issue 3, pp. 498-506, 03/01/1979
Copyright © 1979 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
H. Du, M. Wu, W. Yang, G. Yuan, Y. Sun, Y. Lu, S. Zhao, Q. Du, J. Wang, S. Yang, et al.
Development of Miniaturized Competitive Immunoassays on a Protein Chip as a Screening Tool for Drugs
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2005; 51(2): 368 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. J. Kaur, S. Khurana, and D. M. Salunke
Topological Analysis of the Functional Mimicry between a Peptide and a Carbohydrate Moiety
J. Biol. Chem., February 28, 1997; 272(9): 5539 - 5543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.