JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Volle, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Branisteanu, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Volle, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Branisteanu, D. D.

Statistical parameters of transmitter release at frog neuromuscular junctions treated with guanidine or tetraethylammonium

RL Volle and DD Branisteanu

Transmitter release at Mg++ -depressed frog neuromuscular junctions can be described using binomial statistics. The number of quanta (m) released by the nerve terminal action potential is directly proportional to the mean probability (p) that a quantum will be released and the number of quanta available for release (n). Guanidine or tetraethylammonium (TEA) increased m and n, but had no effect on p. At junctions depressed by d-tubocurarine, both compounds enhanced the amplitude of the initial end-plate potential, caused an accelerated rate of fade of end-plate potential amplitudes and raised the steady- state level of end-plate potential amplitude. This finding was interpreted to mean that guanidine and TEA increased transmitter mobilization and may be related to the increase by the compounds of the parameters n. If so, then the data support the idea that n represents the number of quanta available for release rather than the number of transmitter release sites in the terminal membrane. Neither compound affected the power relationship between [Ca++]o and transmitter release. When plotted on a double logarithmic basis, the slope of the line relating [Ca++]o to increased transmitter release was 3.7, a relationship not altered by the drugs. Thus, the compounds had no effect on the fundamental interaction between Ca++ and transmitter release sites. In contrast to [Ca++]o, the power relationship between increased transmitter release and the concentration of drug in the bathing solution was 0.69 for guanidine and 0.84 for TEA. Because of this finding, it was concluded that the compounds increased transmitter release by mechanisms other than or in addition to increasing Ca++ conductance.

Volume 197, Issue 3, pp. 653-661, 06/01/1976
Copyright © 1976 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1976 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.