JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smolen, V. F.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smolen, V. F.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. J.

Bioavailability analysis of chlorpromazine in humans from pupilometric data

VF Smolen, HR Murdock and EJ Williams

Results of studying the time variation of the miotic response intensity for periods of 6 to 8 hours after dosing in up to 16 normal human subjects who received various oral liquid and intravenous doses of chlorpromazine are reported. Relative to oral liquid doses of chlorpromazine syrup, intravenous doses of the drug slowly infused over a consistent time interval of 30 minutes are approximately 11 times as potent in eliciting miotic response activity. Miotic activity was found to be quite dose sensitive as seen from the response vs. time profiles and the dose-effect curves constructed as plots of areas under the response curves and peak response intensities. The dose-effect curves are approximately linear for both intravenous and oral dosing over the majority of the dose ranges studied. Pupilometry is demonstrated as providing a highly sensitive, reliable, rapid and convenient method for detecting differences in both rates and extents of systemic chlorpromazine bioavailability after parenteral or oral dosing with chlorpromazine. Pupilometry allows comparative bioavailability studies to be readily completed for low oral doses, e.g., 10 mg/70 kg, which are not possible to perform even under the most ideal conditions, using the best direct assay techniques presently available. It is precisely at such low oral doses that bioavailability between oral dosage forms are most pronounced and the use of pupilometry has its greatest utility.

Volume 195, Issue 3, pp. 404-415, 12/01/1975
Copyright © 1975 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.