JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tomosky, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bueding, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tomosky, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bueding, E.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 190, Issue 2, 260-271, 1974
Copyright © 1974 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


TRYPTAMINERGIC AND DOPAMINERGIC RESPONSES OF SCHISTOSOMA MANSONI

Thomas Keith Tomosky 1, James L. Bennett 1, and Ernest Bueding 1

1 Department of Pathobiology, School of Hygiene and Public Health and Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Pharmacological evidence is reported indicating that 5-hydroxytryptamine is an excitatory neurotransmitter in Schistosoma manasoni. The stimulation of the motor activity of adult schistosomes brought about by cholinergic blockade is abolished 1) by bromlysergic acid diethylamide and other 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonists and 2) by prior 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion brought about by exposure of the parasites to chlorimipramine and reserpine. Whereas catecholamines have no effect on the motor activity of schistosomes, low concentrations of dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine (but not isoproterenol) produce a lengthening response of the worm which is ascribed to a relaxation of the longitudinal musculature. The same response was induced by apomorphine, considered to be a specific dopamine receptor agonist, but not by clonidine, a specific norepinephrine receptor agonist. Apomorphine and dopamine were more potent in this respect than norepinephrine and epinephrine. These effects are blocked more effectively by dopamine-blocking agents than by alpha and beta adrenergic blockers. Male worms from single-sex infections differed in their lengthening response from males paired with females.

Submitted on August 3, 1973
Accepted on March 26, 1974







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1974 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.