JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falk, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falk, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, R. W.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 190, Issue 1, 154-164, 1974
Copyright © 1974 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


DIPSOGENIC ACTION OF DIAZOXIDE: A PHARMACOLOGIC ANALYSIS

John L. Falk 1, Maisy Tang 1, and Richard W. Bryant 1

1 Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

Diazoxide s.c. produced a pronounced, dose-related, acute, dipsogenic response (intake of 5-6% of the body weight) in water-satiated rats. Further studies showed that this dipsogenic action was not secondary to a diuresis or acute changes in blood volume or ionic concentrations. Dose-related hypotension was observed. Alpha adrenergic blocking with tolazoline increased the dipsogenic response to diazoxide by 38%, while the beta antagonist propranolol decreased the response (by 71% at the largest dose) as a function of dose level. This graded decrease in the dipsogenic response to diazoxide was attributed to an antagonism of its beta adrenergic action by propranolol, although at the largest dose of propranolol employed a smaller decrease in the dipsogenic responses induced by water deprivation (16%) and by NaCl load (35%) was also observed. Muscarinie blockade with atropine produced decrements in water deprivation- and NaCl-induced drinking at te largest dose employed which were as large or larger than the decrease it effected in diazoxide-induced drinking. The muscarinic component, then, is not a specific feature of diazoxide-induced drinking. Adrenalectomy produced no acute change in the dipsogenic response to diazoxide, but nephrectomy eliminated it even in the presence of renin replacement. We conclude that this drinking response has its origin in a renal beta adrenergic response, but that the crucial participation of the renin-angiotensin system has not been demonstrated.

Submitted on June 18, 1973
Accepted on March 8, 1974







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1974 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.