JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmeister, F.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmeister, F.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. R.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 187, Issue 1, 8-14, 1973
Copyright © 1973 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARISOIN OF CHLORPROMAZINE, IMIPRAMINE, MORPHINE AND d-AMPHETAMINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION IN COCAINE-DEPENDENT RHESUS MONKEYS

Friedrich Hoffmeister 1 and Steven R. Goldberg 1

1 Institut für Pharmakologie der Farbenfabriken Bayer AG, Wuppertal-Elberfeld, Germany

Rhesus monkeys were studied during daily three-hour sessions in which every 10th key press (response) produced an intravenous cocaine injection. Cocaine doses from 0.2 down to 0.05 mg/kg/injection maintained stable responding. When monkeys were maintained at the 0.05 mg/kg/injection cocaine dose, sessions were conducted during which responses produced either saline, d-amphetamine, imipramine, morphine or chlorpromazine injection (substitution sessions) rather than cocaine injections. Response rate over successive saline-substitution sessions gradually decreased. Stable responding, at rates higher than saline-substitution responding, was well maintained during successive substitution sessions, by injections of 0.01 to 0.05 mg/kg of d-amphetamine and by injections of 0.025 to 0.5 mg/kg of morphine. Imipramine, at injection doses of 0.05 to 0.5 mg/kg, failed to maintain rates of responding different from those during saline substitution. Response rates during and after chlorpromazine substitution (0.05-0.5 mg/kg/injection) were markedly suppressed, indicating that chlorpromazine has aversive or punishing properties.

Submitted on April 8, 1971
Accepted on May 29, 1973




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Ritz, R. Lamb, Goldberg SR, and M. Kuhar
Cocaine receptors on dopamine transporters are related to self-administration of cocaine
Science, September 4, 1987; 237(4819): 1219 - 1223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C Spyraki and H. Fibiger
Intravenous self-administration of nomifensine in rats: implications for abuse potential in humans
Science, June 5, 1981; 212(4499): 1167 - 1168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. H. Woods and R. E. Tessel
Fenfluramine: Amphetamine Congener That Fails to Maintain Drug-Taking Behavior in the Rhesus Monkey
Science, September 20, 1974; 185(4156): 1067 - 1069.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1973 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.