JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EVANS, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by PATTON, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by EVANS, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by PATTON, R. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*AMPHETAMINE
*CHLORINE
*d-METHAMPHETAMINE
*SCOPOLAMINE
Medline Plus Health Information
*Methamphetamine
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 186, Issue 1, 10-17, 1973
Copyright © 1973 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


DIURNAL RHYTHM IN BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF METHAMPHETAMINE, p-CHLOROMETHAMPHETAMINE AND SCOPOLAMINE

HUGH L. EVANS 1, WILLIAM B. GHISELLI 1, and ROBERT A. PATTON 1

1 Department of Radiation Biology and Biophysics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York and Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Rats were housed and tested under a controlled cycle of 12 hours light-12 hours dark. Effects of drugs on free-operant avoidance and fixed-interval performance varied from enhancement to depression, depending on the stage of the light-dark cycle at which the drug was administered. Methamphetamine produced the greatest increase in lever pressing when administered during the dark period, regardless of whether responding was maintained by food or by electric shock. This effect appeared to be independent of diurnal differences in base-line response rates. Methamphetamine increased locomotor activity at least as much during the light as during the dark, which suggests a dissociation between effects on operant behavior and effects on locomotor activity. agr-Methyltyrosine was a more effective antagonist of methamphetamine effects in the light than in the dark. Unlike methamphetamine, p-chloromethamphetamine was more effective in increasing responding during the light period. The dose of scopolamine which was most effective in increasing avoidance responding varied from 0.2 mg/kg in the dark to 0.8 mg/kg in the light. Results are discussed with reference to reported diurnal rhythms in behavioral toxicity and in brain amines.

Submitted on September 18, 1972
Accepted on March 12, 1973







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1973 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.