JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yu, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gluckman, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yu, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gluckman, M. I.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 180, Issue 2, 492-500, 1972
Copyright © 1972 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


MECHANISM OF THE INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF CARDIAC GLYCOSIDES ON LIPOLYSIS

Dai Hyon Yu 1, Sharon Triester 1, and M. I. Gluckman 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Radnor, Pennsylvania

The inhibitory effects of cardiac glycosides (CG) on drug-stimulated glycerol release were compared with those of sulfhydryl reagents and metabolic inhibitors in order to study the mechanism of CG action. The biphasic stimulation of lipolysis by norepinephrine was depressed by digitoxin (5 x 10-4 M) in both minced tissue and isolated fat cell preparations. The norepinephrine-induced (5 x 10-4 M) glycerol release also was reduced significantly by p-chloromercuriphenyl sulfonic acid (pCMBS), N-ethylmaleimide, iodoacetamide (IAA), 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) and Dicumarol. The addition of reduced glutathione completely reversed the pCMBS and N-ethylmaleimide inhibitions, partially reversed that due to IAA but was unable to antagonize those caused by DNP, Dicumarol or digitoxin. On the other hand, cysteine and 2,3-dimercaptopropanol significantly reduced only the N-ethylmaleimide inhibition, had no significant effect on pCMBS and IAA and potentiated the antilipolytic effects of DNP, Dicumarol and digitoxin. When norepinephrine (at 2.5 x 10-5 M), theophylline or dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate were employed, all the aforementioned drugs again inhibited glycerol release. The digitoxin (10-4 M) inhibition was completely antagonized by reduced glutathione while that of DNP and Dicumarol was partially reversed. Unlike before, cysteine completely reversed the pCMBS inhibition and significantly reduced that of IAA. The remainder of the effects were comparable to those described above. In addition to the resemblance of the effects of CG (at 10-4 M) to —SH inhibitors, higher concentrations of CG (5 x 10-4 M) behaved similarly to those of metabolic inhibitors (10-3 M). These findings suggest that CG may exert their antilipolytic effects by alteration of membrane structure and/or by interference with oxidative metabolism.

Submitted on March 20, 1971
Accepted on October 12, 1971







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1972 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.