JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sastry Rama, B. V.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sastry Rama, B. V.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, H. C.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 180, Issue 2, 326-339, 1972
Copyright © 1972 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


DISSOCIATION CONSTANTS OF D- AND L-LACTOYLCHOLINES AND RELATED COMPOUNDS AT CHOLINERGIC RECEPTORS

B. V. Sastry Rama 1 and H. C. Cheng 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee

The dissociation constants (KA) and the relative intrinsic efficacies (egr) of lactoylcholines and related compounds were determined on the longitudinal muscle of the guinea-pig ileum (for muscarinic activity) and the frog rectus abdominis muscle (for nicotinic activity). The KAS of these agonists at muscarinic receptors increase in the following order: acetyl- < propionyl- < acryloyl- le D-lactoyl- le DL-lactoyl- < L-lactoylcholines. Their egrS at the muscarinic receptors have the following order: acetyl- > propionyl- > acryloyl- = D-lactoyl- = DL-lactoyl- = L-lactoylcholines. An increase in the size of the acyl group among these choline esters decreases the affinity and the egr at muscarinic receptors. The difference in the muscarinic potencies of D- and L-lactoylcholines is due to the difference in their affinities. KAS at nicotinic receptors increase in this order: acetyl- le propionyl- le acryloyl- D-lactoyl- < DL-lactoyl < L-lactoylcholine. All of these compounds have the same egrS. The charge on the carbonyl-carbon of these choline esters contributes to their affinities at the nicotinic receptors. There is an apparent linear relationship between the negative logarithm of the ED5O and the negative logarithm of the KA among these compounds. Whereas both types of cholinergic receptors are specific for D-lactoylcholine, cholinesterases are stereospecific for L-lactoylcholines. There is no significant difference between KAS of acetyicholine at muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. Other choline esters exhibited significant differences in their KAS at these receptors. Muscarinic and nicotinic receptors may be termed as isoceptors (receptors with close similarities in the critical active site area but with differences in the environment of the areas adjacent to active sites) with significant differences in the environment of the site 2 where at least one of the oxygen atoms of a choline ester interacts for inducing the pharmacological effect.

Submitted on May 3, 1971
Accepted on October 13, 1971







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1972 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.