JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KUMAR, R.
Right arrow Articles by ABELMANN, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KUMAR, R.
Right arrow Articles by ABELMANN, W. H.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 180, Issue 1, 24-30, 1972
Copyright © 1972 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECTS OF ACETYL STROPHANTHIDIN ON CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTION IN INTACT, CONSCIOUS DOGS

RAJ KUMAR 1, WILLIAM B. HOOD JR. 1, DAVID P. GILMOUR 1, and WALTER H. ABELMANN 1

1 Thorndike Memorial Laboratory, Harvard Medical Unit, Boston City Hospital and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Eight intact, conscious mongrel dogs were studied to investigate the hemodynamic effects of and tolerance to acetyl strophanthidin and the data were compared with those from anesthetized dogs described in the literature. The study was done under light sedation with morphine sulfate, 15 mg. Acetyl strophanthidin was given i.v. by continuous infusion at 3 µg/kg/min until ventricular tachycardia was noted. It was found that in conscious animals, acetyl strophanthidin did not significantly alter heart rate, aortic, pulmonary arterial or left ventricular end-diastolic pressures or systemic or pulmonary vascular resistance. Stroke volume, systolic ejection rate and stroke power increased significantly. These results contrast strikingly with the rise in peripheral vascular resistance and decrease in cardiac output which is noted in anesthetized dogs. The results suggest that the more competent barostatic mechanism in the unanesthetized state may produce an entirely different hemodynamic response to systemic digitalization compared to the anesthetized state.

Submitted on June 22, 1970
Accepted on October 5, 1971







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1972 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.