JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GALINDO, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GALINDO, A.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 177, Issue 2, 360-368, 1971
Copyright © 1971 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


PROCAINE, PENTOBARBITAL AND HALOTHANE: EFFECTS ON THE MAMMALIAN MYONEURAL JUNCTION

ANIBAL GALINDO 1

1 Department of Anesthesiology and the Anesthesia Research Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Experiments were performed on rat phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparations maintained at 32 ± 2°C. Simultaneous recordings of tension output and intracellular events were made in isometrically contracting muscles. Procaine, pentobarbital and halothane depressed pro- and postjunctional structures; however, neuromuscular block under procaine and pentobarbital was of prejunctional origin whereas under halothane it could be explained by depression of postjunctional structures. Procaine and pentobarbital greatly lengthened the duration of the absolute refractory period of motor nerve terminals; this prolongation was minimal with halothane. Pentobarbjtal depolarized the end-plate membrane more than 10 mV, an effect not seen with procaine or halothane. Procaine, unlike pentobarbital or halothane affected the propagation of end-plate potentials to the muscular fiber. During tetanic stimulation of the phrenic nerve, failure to maintain strength of muscular contraction was of prejunctional origin under all three anesthetic agents; however, in most experiments under halothane the strength of these contractions increased rather than faded.

Submitted on November 2, 1970
Accepted on January 15, 1971




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Suzuki, H. Mizutani, K. Ishikawa, E. Miyake, S. Saeki, and S. Ogawa
Epidurally administered mepivacaine delays recovery of train-of-four ratio from vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2007; 99(5): 721 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1971 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.