JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WATKINS, D.
Right arrow Articles by LAZAROW, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WATKINS, D.
Right arrow Articles by LAZAROW, A.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 176, Issue 1, 42-51, 1971
Copyright © 1971 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECT OF SULFHYDRYL-BINDING REAGENTS ON ISLET TISSUE PERMEABILITY: PROTECTION AND REVERSAL BY THIOL COMPOUNDS

DUDLEY WATKINS 1, S. J. COOPERSTEIN 1, and ARNOLD LAZAROW 1

1 Department of Anatomy, University of Connecticut Schools of Medicine and Dental Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut; Department of Anatomy, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

The ability of various thiol compounds to protect against and reverse the action of alloxan and other sulfhydryl-binding reagents on islet tissue permeability was studied. When islet slices were preincubated in alloxan, washed and incubated in d-mannitol-1-C14 (which does not normally penetrate cells), the amount of C14 in the tissue was increased as a result of the alloxan-induced damage to the cell membranes. Pretreatment of the tissue with 2,3-dimercaptopropanol (BAL), glutathione (GSH) or cysteine before treatment with alloxan completely protected the slices against the action of alloxan. In contrast, when islet slices were first preincubated in alloxan and then preincubated in the thiol compound, only the dithiol, BAL, reversed the effect. Similar results were obtained with a number of dithiol-binding reagents (Co++, Hg++, AsO2- and dichlorophenylarsine), whereas Cd++ differed in that GSH also partially reversed its effect. The results obtained with the alkylating reagent, N-ethylmaleimide, were similar to those obtained with the dithiol-binding reagents; however, another alkylating reagent, iodoacetic acid, differed in that GSH did not protect the islets from its action and BAL only partially reversed its effect. When the oxidizing reagents, oxidized glutathione and cystine, were used, both GSH and BAL completely reversed their effect. Since GSH reversed the effect of oxidized glutathione but not that of ailoxan, the reaction of alloxan with the membrane sulfhydryl groups probably involves more than simple oxidation of SH groups to the disulfide form.

Submitted on May 12, 1970
Accepted on September 21, 1970







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1971 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.