JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DALTON, C.
Right arrow Articles by SHEPPARD, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DALTON, C.
Right arrow Articles by SHEPPARD, H.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 173, Issue 2, 270-276, 1970
Copyright © 1970 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


INVESTIGATION OF THE MECHANISM OF ACTION OF THE LIPOLYTIC AGENT 4-(3, 4-DIMETHOXYBENZYL)-2-IMIDAZOLIDINONE (Ro 7-2956)

COLIN DALTON 1, JANIE B. QUINN 1, CHARLES R. BURGHARDT 1, and HERBERT SHEPPARD 1

1 Biological Research Division, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Nutley, New Jersey

Ro 7-2956 elevated serum free fatty acid levels and stimulated glycerol and free fatty acid release from isolated fat cells of the rat. Attempts were made to compare its effects with those of norepinephrine and theophylline. The relative resistance of the Ro 7-2956-induced lipolytic response to the blocking action of propranolol and the failure of this drug to activate erythrocyte adenyl cyclase negate its role as a beta agonist. However, its effects in combination with imidazole or nicotinic acid left doubts that Ro 7-2956 was theophylline-like. Even though theophylline had greater lipolytic potency than Ro 7-2956, the lipolytic response to a combination of adenosine-3',5'-cydlic phosphate with theophylline was less than the sum of each, whereas that of a combination with Ro 7-2956 was greater. Although both theophylline and Ro 7-2956 inhibited phosphodiesterase, the order of potency for lipolysis was the reverse of that for inhibition. It is concluded that the lipolytic response to Ro 7-2956 could result from its inhibition of phosphodiesterase but that the response to theophylline must involve other factors.

Submitted on November 13, 1969
Accepted on February 17, 1970







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1970 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.