![]() |
|
|
1 Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
The effects of pH gradients on the uptakes amphibian nerve trunks is greater than in solutions with which they have been equilibrated, more so at pH 8.2 than at pH 7.2, and more so in intact than in desheathed preparations at pH 8.2. The presence of a pH gradient at the perineural sheath of an intact frog sciatic nerve in an alkaline media can be demonstrated by measurements of the tissue uptake of the weak acid 5,5-dimethyl-2,4-oxazolidinedione. pH gradients between extracellular and intracellular water phases, large enough to concentrate the cationic form of the local anesthetic at sites at a lower pH within the nerve tissue, can be demonstrated even in completely desheathed sciatic nerves. The apparent diffusion coefficients for the drugs in nerve tissue were estimated from washout curves. The washout of lidocaine is faster than procaine. The washout of either drug is faster at a neutral rather than alkaline pH, which demonstrates that pH gradients influence rates of diffusion as well as equilibrium con centrations of ionizable drugs in tissues.
Submitted on August 4, 1969
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. A. Visser, R. A. Lee, and M. J. M. Gielen Factors Affecting the Distribution of Neural Blockade by Local Anesthetics in Epidural Anesthesia and a Comparison of Lumbar Versus Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 708 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Arakawa, Y. Aoyama, and Y. Ohe Block of the sacral segments in lumbar epidural anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2003; 90(2): 173 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Arakawa, Y. Aoyama, and Y. Ohe Epidural bolus injection with alkalinized lidocaine improves blockade of the first sacral segment - a brief report: [L'injection epidurale d'un bolus de lidocaine alcalinisee ameliore le blocage du premier segment sacre - un resume] Can J Anesth, June 1, 2002; 49(6): 566 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||