JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LUDENS, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMSON, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LUDENS, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMSON, H. E.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 171, Issue 2, 300-306, 1970
Copyright © 1970 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


DIFFERENTIAL EFFECT OF FUROSEMIDE ON RENAL AND LIMB BLOOD FLOWS IN THE CONSCIOUS DOG

JAMES H. LUDENS 1, DAVID C. HEITZ 1, MICHAEL J. BRODY 1, and HAROLD E. WILLIAMSON 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

The effect of furosemide on renal hemodynamics has been studied quite extensively. However, the possibility that the hemodynamic effects of furosemide are not limited to renal vessels and that this drug also affects other vascular beds has not been examined. In the present study the effect of furosemide on limb blood flow was assessed in unanesthetized dogs containing chronically implanted flow transducers and pressure cannulas. The results showed that the effect of flurosemide on limb blood flow differs quite markedly from the effect of this drug on renal blood flow. Furosemide increases renal blood flow but was found to produce a decrease in limb blood flow. Renal blood flow rose rapidly after drug administration, was elevated maximally by 10 minutes and had returned to the control level of flow by 30 minutes after drug administration. Limb blood flow, in contrast, decreased much less rapidly and remained below the control level of flow after reqal blood flow had returned to the control level of flow. Intraiiac infusions of furosemide failed to alter limb blood flow; whereas, intrarenal infusions of the drug produced almost immediate changes in renal blood flow. Changes in renal blood flow and limb blood flow produced by furosemide were not altered by prior treatment with the ganghionic blocking agent pentolinium. Thus, furosemide does not appear to act directly on limb vascular smooth muscle nor does it appear to decrease limb blood flow by an indirect neurogenic or reflex mechanism. However, when furosemide was given to nephrectomized dogs, it was found that bilateral nephrectomy abolished the decrease in limb blood flow produced by furosemide. It therefore appears that the sustained decrease in limb blood flow produced by furosemide administration may result from the action of a circulating vasoconstrictor substance elaborated by the kidney.

Submitted on August 8, 1969
Accepted on October 17, 1969







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1970 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.