JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CHIOU, C. Y.
Right arrow Articles by LONG, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CHIOU, C. Y.
Right arrow Articles by LONG, J. P.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 167, Issue 2, 344-350, 1969
Copyright © 1969 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECTS OF agr, aacgr-BIS-(DIMETHYLAMMONIUMACETALDEHYDE DIETHYLACETAL) -p , p-DIACETYLBIPHENYL BROMIDE (DMAE) ON NEUROMUSCULAR TRANSMISSION

C. Y. CHIOU 1 and J. P. LONG 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Iowa, College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa

agr, aacgr-Bis-(dimethylammoniumacetaldehyde diethylacetal)-p, pgr-diacetylbiphenyl bromide (DMAE) has been found to block neuromuscular transmission at rabbit sciatic nerve-gastrocnemius muscle. During the early phase of blockade, the effect of DMAE was augmented by choline, suggesting that there is no hemicholinium (HC-3)-like blockade of acetylcholine (ACh) synthesis. During the late phase of neuromuscular blockade, however, the DMAE blockade was reversed by choline but not by decamethonium nor by d-tubocurarine. Neostigmine antagonized the effect of DMAE when the dose of DMAE was low (0.2 mg/kg) but not when the dose was high (2 mg/kg). These results indicate that DMAE might be slowly converted into HC-3 in the body to block the ACh synthesis during the late phase. The ED50's of DMAE were fairly close to those of HC-3, which might also indicate the conversion of DMAE to HC-3. DMAE appears not to be a depolarizing agent since 1) it blocked neuromuscular transmission without initial facilitation; 2) its neuromuscular blockade was unaffected or partially antagonized by neostigmine; 3) it did not contract frog rectus abdominis muscle, guinea-pig ileum and baby chicken biventer cervicis muscle; and 4) it blocked ACh and nicotine responses on frog rectus abdominis muscle. However, the nondepolarizing blockade of DMAE was not a curare-like effect because there was no parallel shift of the dose-response curves of ACh on frog rectus abdominis muscle by DMAE.

Submitted on October 11, 1969
Accepted on February 28, 1969







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1969 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.