JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KALSNER, S.
Right arrow Articles by NICKERSON, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KALSNER, S.
Right arrow Articles by NICKERSON, M.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 165, Issue 2, 152-165, 1969
Copyright © 1969 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


DISPOSITION OF NOREPINEPHRINE AND EPINEPHRINE IN VASCULAR TISSUE, DETERMINED BY THE TECHNIQUE OF OIL IMMERSION

STANLEY KALSNER 1 and MARK NICKERSON 1

1 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Manitoba Faculty of Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Experiments with the oil-immersion technique demonstrated that Omethylation is the primary enzymatic mechanism for the inactivation of a low concentration (1x10-8) of both norepinephrine and epinephrine in rabbit aortic strips, but inhibition of catechol-O-methyltransferase slowed the rate of inactivation of norepinephrine considerably less than it did that of epinephrine. Inhibition of monoamine oxidase had a negligible effect on the inactivation of either, if catechol-O-methyltransferase activity was unimpaired. The effects of combinations of inhibitors indicated that catechol-O-methyltransferase and monoamine oxidase function in series, with the latter an effective alternate mechanism for the inactivation of norepinephrine and somewhat less effective for epinephrine. A possible anatomical basis for this behavior is pointed out. Experiments with a 100-fold higher concentration of these catecholamines showed that the major intrinsic pathways of inactivation are deamination and O-methylation for norepinephrine and epinephrine, respectively. It is suggested that the high concentration of agonist swamped the normal, organized system of inactivation, with a more or less simultaneous presentation of amine to both enzymes, which revealed their capacities for handling the two catecholamines. The contributions of binding and storage mechanisms to norepinephrine and epinephrine inactivation were assessed on the basis of the effects of cocaine. These processes were found to be considerably less important than enzymatic pathways in the inactivation of physiologic concentrations of norepinephrine and epinephrine and were found to make only a minor contribution to the inactivation of high concentrations.

Submitted on June 4, 1968
Accepted on September 16, 1968







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1969 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.