JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SMITH, E. R.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 164, Issue 2, 312-316, 1968
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE STIMULATION OF CANINE PROSTATIC SECRETION BY PARASYMPATHOMIMETIC AGENTS

EMIL R. SMITH 1

1 Mason Research institute, Worcester, Massachusetts

In unanesthetized, castrated, testosterone-treated dogs with surgically prepared fistulas which allowed the collection of prostatic fluid uncontaminated by urine, the s.c. administration of piocarpine hydrochloride, acetylcholine chloride, methacholine chloride and oxotremorine oxalate produced distinct secretory responses accompanied by parasympathomimetic effects such as salivation, reflex tachycardia and emesis. The i.v. administration, of relatively small doses of physostigmine and neostigmine similarly produced salivation but did not provoke prostatic secretion. Doses of these drugs sufficiently large to stimulate prostatic secretion also provoked more severe effects, the most notable being a transient prostration. it is concluded that the prostate gland of the dog is relatively more sensitive to direct-acting agents such as acetyicholine, methacholine and oxotremorine than to indirect-acting substances like physostigmine and neostigmine, and this conclusion is discussed in relation to present knowledge concerning the autonomic innervation of the prostate gland of the dog.

Submitted on April 22, 1968
Accepted on July 26, 1968




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. G. Wientjes, J. H. Zheng, L. Hu, Y. Gan, and J. L-S. Au
Intraprostatic Chemotherapy: Distribution and Transport Mechanisms
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 11(11): 4204 - 4211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.