JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DOMINO, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by OLDS, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DOMINO, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by OLDS, M. E.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 164, Issue 1, 202-211, 1968
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


CHOLINERGIC INHIBITION OF SELF-STIMULATION BEHAVIOR

EDWARD F. DOMINO 1 and MARIANNE E. OLDS 1

1 Michigan Neuropsychopharmacology Research Program, Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of two acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors, physostigmine and neostigmine, on self-stimulation behavior in the rat and to correlate their behavioral effects with total brain acetyicholine (ACh) and AChE. The effects of equimolar doses of physostigmine and neostigmine were compared after s.c. injection. Adult Holtzman male rats were implanted with chronic bipolar electrodes in the hypothalamus for optimal seIf-stimulation behavior. Physostigmine was much more effective than neostigmine in depressing self-stimulation. An increase in brain ACh and a decrease in AChE were obtained after physostigmine, which correlated with behavioral depressant effects. Similar findings were not observed with equimolar doses of neostigmine, indicating that the latter does not penetrate readily into the brain to affect this behavior. Even large doses of neostigmine which depressed self-stimulation did not cause an increase in brain ACh or a lowering of AChE, suggesting that this depression was due to a peripheral mechanism. It is concluded that in rats central cholinergic neuronal systems are involved in inhibiting the self-stimulation of the hypothalamus with an electrical current.

Submitted on November 15, 1967
Accepted on July 1, 1968




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
A Gratton and R. Wise
Hypothalamic reward mechanism: two first-stage fiber populations with a cholinergic component
Science, February 1, 1985; 227(4686): 545 - 548.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.