JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GILLIS, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by ALPER, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GILLIS, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by ALPER, M. H.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 163, Issue 2, 277-286, 1968
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


ACTIONS OF ANTICHOLINESTERASE AGENTS UPON GANGLIONIC TRANSMISSION IN THE DOG

R. A. GILLIS 1, W. FLACKE 1, J. M. GARFIELD 1, and M. H. ALPER 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

The effect of anticholinesterase agents on impulse transmission in cardiac sympathetic ganglia was studied in open-chest, spinal dogs. The right preganglionic trunk was stimulated supramaximally at increasing frequencies; heart rate was used as indicator. Physostigmine (0.2-0.3 mg/kg) or diisopropylfluorophosphate (0.5-2 mg/kg) did not affect the resting heart rate when given slowly in divided doses. Conditions of pure nicotinic or pure muscarinic transmission were produced by administration of supramaximal doses of either atropine or nicotinic blocking agents (hexamethonium, nicotine, mecamylamine and chlorisondamine) respectively. The anticholinesterase agents did not potentiate transmission under nicotinic conditions with submaximal stimulation or even when partial block by hexamethonium or mecamylamine was produced. In contrast, the same doses of anticholinesterase agents shifted the frequency-response curve to the left when transmission was muscarinic. Antagonism to complete block produced by nicotinic agents plus small doses of atropine could also be shown and was blocked by subsequent larger doses of atropine. Transmission depressed after hemicholinium-3 was restored by anticholinesterase agents under muscarinic but not under nicotinic conditions. The different effects of the anticholinesterases under the two conditions are interpreted as evidence for a different role of cholinesterase in impulse transmission under these conditions.

Submitted on July 5, 1968
Accepted on July 5, 1968







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.