JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FURCHGOTT, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by GARCIA, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FURCHGOTT, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by GARCIA, P. S.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 163, Issue 1, 98-122, 1968
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECTS OF INHIBITION OF MONOAMINE OXIDASE ON THE ACTIONS AND INTERACTIONS OF NOREPINEPHRINE, TYRAMINE AND OTHER DRUGS ON GUINEA-PIG LEFT ATRIUM

ROBERT F. FURCHGOTT 1 and PEDRO SANCHEZ GARCIA 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) in electrically driven left atria was inhibited by pretreatment with iproniazid or pheniprazine. Pheniprazine, while present, sensitized to norepinephrine (NE), apparently by blocking uptake. Atria from reserpine-pretreated animals have very little NE, and on incubation with NE or H3-NE, followed by a 45-min wash, showed markedly lower net uptake than did normal atria. After MAO inhibition net uptake increased in both preparations, but on a percentage basis it increased very much more in reserpine-treated atria. MAO inhibition sensitized normal atria markedly to tyramine, but only slightly to Paredrine and amphetamine; sensitization was attributed almost completely to protection of tyramine taken up by adrenergic neurons, and not of NE released. MAO inhibition produced a "secondary sensitization" to NE, characterized by a gradual, additional increase in amplitude on long exposures to NE, and a slower decline after washout. This pattern was attributed to free NE leaking from structures in which it had accumulated to levels exceeding the removal capacity of storage granules and cytoplasmic binding sites. MAO inhibition greatly enhanced the ability of exposures to NE to restore the response of reserpine-treated atria to tyramine and other indirectly acting sympathomimetics. The enhancement was due principally to protection of NE taken up. The restored response was attributed to displacement of retained NE from cytoplasmic binding sites of uptake structures (probably neurons). Tyramine (10, µg/ml, 10 min) released only part of the retained NE, but release of extremely small amounts produced very large responses. Under certain circumstances no correlation existed between retained NE and magnitude of restored response. Restored responses to cocaine appeared to be due to block of reuptake of NE leaking from uptake structures. Dopa and dopamine (MAO inhibited) and agr-methyl-NE (MAO inhibited or not) were very effective in restoring response to tyramine. agr-Methyl-dopa was less effective.

Submitted on December 27, 1967
Accepted on March 29, 1968







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.