JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RIKER, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by GUERRERO, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RIKER, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by GUERRERO, S.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 163, Issue 1, 54-63, 1968
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE PRODUCTION OF STIMULUS-BOUND REPETITION BY NEOSTIGMINE IN SYMPATHETIC GANGLION CELLS

WILLIAM K. RIKER 1 and SERGIO GUERRERO 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, Woman's Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Intracellular recordings were made in isolated sympathetic ganglia of bullfrogs. With orthodromic stimulation (0.1 impulse/sec) in drug-free Ringer's solution, stimulus-bound repetition (SBR) occurred in about 10% of the ganglion cells, appearing as two spike responses to a single stimulus. In these cells the second, or repetitive, spike arises from the relatively persistent and large synaptic potential. After orthodromic tetanic conditioning (50 stimuli/sec, 40 sec), approximately 18% of the cells exhibited SBR. In the presence of neostigmine (0.06-6 µ M), 62% of the cells displayed SBR without tetanic conditioning, whereas after conditioning nearly every cell fired repetitively, with the number of stimulus-bound repetitive spikes ranging between two and nine. Underlying the increased incidence and degree of SBR was an increased duration and amplitude of the synaptic potential. SBR was particularly dependent on orthodromic stimulus frequency, with repetitive spikes being abolished progressively as frequency was raised above 0.1 impulse/sec. All cells in the presence of neostigmine displayed spontaneous miniature synaptic potentials which were sometimes large enough to initiate spikes. Antidromic stimuli always evoked single spike responses, and antidromic tetanization (50 stimuh/sec, 40 sec) never elicited SBR. Repetitive spiking did not occur at higher concentrations of neostigmine (0.6 mM). The results suggest that SBR reflects a prejunctional action of neostigmine, the mechanism of which remains to be determined.

Submitted on January 29, 1968
Accepted on May 23, 1968







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.