JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearl, J.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearl, J.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, L. S.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 160, Issue 1, 217-230, 1968
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


PREVENTION OF WRITHING AND OTHER EFFECTS OF NARCOTICS AND NARCOTIC ANTAGONISTS IN MICE

Jack Pearl 1, Mario D. Aceto 1, and Louis S. Harris 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, Sterling-Winthrop Research Institute, Rensselaer, New York

There was a rank-order correlation between the potencies of drugs in preventing phenylquinone-induced writhing in mice and their analgesic potencies in man within each of three groups: narcotics such as morphine; strong narcotic antagonists such as nalorphine; weak narcotic antagonists such as pentazocine. Antiwrithing potency ratios underestimated the analgesic potency ratios of narcotic antagonists, especially strong narcotic antagonists. Morphine was over 90 times more potent than nalorphine in preventing writhing. Rank orders for antiwrithing potencies of drugs were consistent with previous results, although there were inconsistencies in potency ratios, some of which may reflect differences in the sensitivity of writhing tests in detecting effects of narcotic antagonists. Within each group, the potencies of drugs in affecting writhing and rotarod performance were correlated. Within the narcotics, results of both tests correlated with Straub tail activity, and within the narcotic antagonists, with decreased locomotion. If all analgesics were taken as one group, the correlation between analgesic and antiwrithing potencies was less than that between analgesic potency and rotarod performance. Of drugs having analgesic activity in man, all seven narcoties and four of 13 narcotic antagonists prevented writhing at doses lower than those that produced other overt effects. Of nine drugs not usually called analgesics, none prevented writhing at doses lower than those that produced other effects. Among benzomorphans, the l-isomers were more potent than their d-isomers in affecting writhing and rotarod performance.

Submitted on March 1, 1967
Accepted on October 20, 1967




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
D. Le Bars, M. Gozariu, and S. W. Cadden
Animal Models of Nociception
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2001; 53(4): 597 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. I. Damaj, W. Glassco, M. D. Aceto, and B. R. Martin
Antinociceptive and Pharmacological Effects of Metanicotine, a Selective Nicotinic Agonist
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 1999; 291(1): 390 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. I. Damaj, W. Glassco, M. J. Marks, B. Slobe, J. R. James, E. L. May, J. A. Rosecrans, A. C. Collins, and B. R. Martin
Pharmacological Investigation of (+)- and (-)-cis-2,3,3a,4,5,9b-Hexahydro-1-methyl-1H-pyrrolo[3,2-h]isoquinoline, a Bridged-Nicotine Analog
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 1997; 282(3): 1425 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.