JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARSHALL, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MARSHALL, E. K., JR.
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, J. W.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 16, Issue 4, 259-272, 1920
Copyright © 1920 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE TOXICITY AND SKIN IRRITANT EFFECT OF CERTAIN DERIVATIVES OF DICHLOROETHYL SULFIDE

E. K. MARSHALL JR. 1 and JOHN W. WILLIAMS 1

1 From the Laboratory of Pharmacology, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis

The toxicity on subcutaneous injection into mice has been determined, for a number of derivatives of dichloroethyl sulfide. Certain relations between toxicity and chemical constitution have been pointed out.

2. The skin irritant effect of these compounds has been examined on man. Dichloroethyl sulfone is of the same order of activity as dichloroethyl sulfide, while dichloroethyl sulfoxide is practically inert. The former hydrolizes readily in weak alkali, while the latter does not. The activity of the other compounds has been discussed.

3. The compounds have been examined for their antiseptic properties.

4. The toxicity of dichloroethyl sulfoxide and dichloroethyl sulfone, while of the same magnitude for mice, is markedly different for unicellular organisms, the latter being a hundred times more toxic than the former.

5. The solubility of certain of the derivatives in water and xylene, as well as their rapidity of hydrolysis to yield an acid has been determined. An attempt has been made to correlate with these properties their physiological action as far as determined.

6. The evidence obtained as far as it goes is not in disagreement with the theory of intracellular acid production previously proposed to explain the action of mustard gas. Considerable support is given the theory by the study of the dichloroethyl sulfoxide and sulfone.

Submitted on July 30, 1920







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1920 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.