JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Usubiaga, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Standaert, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Usubiaga, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Standaert, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*DIBUCAINE
*LIDOCAINE
*PROCAINE
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 159, Issue 2, 353-361, 1968
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE EFFECTS OF LOCAL ANESTHETICS ON MOTOR NERVE TERMINALS

Jose E. Usubiaga 1 and Frank Standaert 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York

The effects of four local anesthetics, procaine, lidocaine, tetracaine and dibucaine, were studied on the soleus neuromuscular preparation of the cat in vivo. All local anesthetics injected i.a. or i.v. depressed the posttetanic potentiation of the soleus muscle and abolished the neural repetitive afterdischarge of the motor nerve terminals. In addition, local anesthetics modified the pattern of tetanic muscle contraction. Lidocaine was 1.5, tetracaine was 10 and dibucaine was 15 times more potent than procaine in depressing posttetanic potentiation. Recovery of posttetanic potentiation (PTP) was rapid following procaine and lidocaine, but it was prolonged after tetracaine and dibucaine administration. Since PTP and posttetanic repetitive activity are neural events and local anesthetics depressed them without depressing the transmission of single twitches, it is concluded that local anesthetics act by selective depreseion of the motor nerve terminal. The correlation between drug potencies for PTP suppression and local anesthetic potency for blocking conduction in peripheral nerves and the agreement between doses depressing PTP and those affecting central nervous system neurons also support a neural locus of action. The possibility of a postjunctional effect of local anesthetics is considered, but, according to the dose-response relationship, it only occurs after the injection of larger doses.

Submitted on June 26, 1967
Accepted on October 4, 1967




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Suzuki, H. Mizutani, K. Ishikawa, E. Miyake, S. Saeki, and S. Ogawa
Epidurally administered mepivacaine delays recovery of train-of-four ratio from vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2007; 99(5): 721 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Agarwal, R. Pandey, S. Dhiraaj, P. K. Singh, M. Raza, C. K. Pandey, D. Gupta, A. Choudhury, and U. Singh
The Effect of Epidural Bupivacaine on Induction and Maintenance Doses of Propofol (Evaluated by Bispectral Index) and Maintenance Doses of Fentanyl and Vecuronium
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1684 - 1688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.