JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riker, W. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riker, W. K.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 159, Issue 2, 345-352, 1968
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


GANGLION CELL DEPOLARIZATION AND TRANSMISSION BLOCK BY ACh: INDEPENDENT EVENTS

W. K. Riker 1

1 Woman's Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Acetylcholine (ACh) was injected (10 µ of 2, 5.5 or 16.5 mM) during intracellular recording of evoked orthodromic responses in frog sympathetic ganglia. Transmission block and ganglion cell depolarization by ACh were dissociated in the following ways. 1) Transmission block frequently occurred at levels of ganglion cell depolarization lower than the maximum attained, and persisted longer than ganglion cell depolarization. 2) Passage of inward current, during transmission block and ganglion cell depolarization, restored membrane potential to the resting level but did not restore transmission. 3) A number of cells were not depolarized at all by low doses of ACh (2 mM), yet transmission block still occurred. 4) Orthodromic responses were not abolished during ganglion cell depolarization (10-15 mV) produced by outward current, but equivalent ganglion cell depolarization produced by ACh caused transmission block in approximately 80% of cells. 5) The ACh doses tested do not abolish antidromic and direct spikes. These results suggest that transmission block and ganglion cell depolarization by ACh are not mechanistically linked. They also suggest, with the lack of evidence for specific interaction between ACh and a synaptic region of the cell (Ginsborg and Guerrero, 1964; Riker. 1967a), that there is no reason to assign ACh transmission block to a postsynaptic site. It is proposed that ACh transmission block occurs at the unmyelinated terminal portions of the presynaptic nerve.

Submitted on September 21, 1967
Accepted on October 31, 1967







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.