JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gram, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fouts, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gram, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Fouts, J. R.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 158, Issue 2, 317-322, 1967
Copyright © 1967 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


FURTHER STUDIES ON THE METABOLISM OF DRUGS BY SUBFRACTIONS OF HEPATIC MICROSOMES. III. EFFECTS OF THE NADPH-GENERATING SYSTEM

Theodore E. Gram 1 and James R. Fouts 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

In previous work we have found a marked concentration of several drug-metabolizing enzymes in the smooth-surfaced subfraction of hepatic microsomes. In the present work we studied the influence of three different NADPH- generating systems as well as addition of NADPH (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) itself on the apparent distribution of three drug-metabolizing enzymes within microsomal subfractions. The NADPH-generating systems consisted of one of the following : 1) NADP (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate), hepatic soluble fraction (105,000 x g supernatant) and glucose-6-phosphate, 2) NADP, yeast glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphate or 3) NADP, isocitrate and isocitrate dehydrogenase.With all three of the generating systems, we observed significantly greater activity in smooth-surfaced microsomes than in rough-surfaced microsomes for the metabolism of hexoharbital, aniline and aminopyrine. The addition of NADPH to incubation mixtures produced less consistent results; with hexobarbital or aminopyrine as substrates, no differences in drug metabolism were observed between smooth-and rough-surfaced microsomes, but with aniline as substrate, NADPH addition resulted in significantly greater metabolism by smooth-surfaced microsomes than by rough-surfaced microsomes. These results further support the concept of inequality of enzyme distribution within hepatic microsomal subfractions and suggest an important difference between enzymically reduced NADP and exogenous NADPH with respect to availability or utilizability by microsomal enzymes.

Submitted on May 29, 1967
Accepted on June 27, 1967







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1967 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.