JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, H. C.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 158, Issue 1, 89-98, 1967
Copyright © 1967 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


ON THE MECHANISM OF NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING ACTION OF BRETYLIUM AND GUANETHIDINE

C. C. Chang 1, T. F. Chen 1, and H. C. Cheng 1

1 Pharmacological Institute, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

Bretylium and guanethidine had a postsynaptic blocking action at nerve-muscle junctions in rat diaphragm and frog sartorius preparations. This action was indicated by the ability of these drugs to reduce the amplitude of end-plate potentials and miniature end-plate potentials without affecting the extracellularly recorded presynaptic nerve action potential or the muscle membrane potential. Responses to acetylcholine (ACh) in the presence of neostigmine were also reduced by these drugs in both frog rectus abdominis and chick biventer cervicis preparations. It was felt that this effect was not the main cause of neuromuscular block by these drugs. In the case of bretylium the main cause was demonstrated to be a reduction of the release of ACh from motor nerve endings upon nerve stimulation. The intensification of neuromuscular block by increasing the stimulus rate and the rapid decline of the amplitude of successive end-plate potentials on repetitive stimulation suggest that the presynaptic effect of bretylium is hemicholinium-like. In the case of guanethidine the main effect appeared to be on muscle fibers. Contractile responses to direct muscle stimulation were reduced by this drug and the form of muscle action potentials was changed. It is concluded that bretylium and guanethidine have entirely different effects on the cholinergic system of the skeletal muscle.

Submitted on January 9, 1967
Accepted on June 14, 1967







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1967 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.